caveat with no.10962142

caveat with no.10962142 on the said client lease being business lease no. 9431430 : IT WAS REMOVED WITH NO NOTIFICATION - PLEASE EXPLAIN

Thats ok - I must admit, you are a smart person but also a very ignorant person! Its only a matter of time - you will be dealt with! [ without prejudice and all action taken will be within the court system of Australia]

Mobile Phone Messages to and from 0403353461 and 0422655768 on the 23 March 2010

• Considering I sent this letter via email to only a few people at 9.10am on the 23-03-2010 (3 years with no success of a return call, text or email turned into success in 1 hour) the mobile number with no signature 0403353461 - Looking at the details contained within the messages received from 0403353461 indicates to me that these are words of a female unless of course this particular male likes to think ???? 
• (refer message 5 below, the words written and sent by the sender 0403353461)

 

• Take note Message 3: Signature not signiture all I ask is that if you are going to be a cyber bully state the most recent facts and stop guessing - 
• [my interpretation to this comment is this person is stating that this website contains facts, facts that are just not up to date. Thats good to know] 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. MESSAGE RECEIVED on my mobile phone being number 0422 655 768 at 10.16am on the 23-03-2010 from mobile phone +61403353461 with no signature :

• 10.16am

• It must be extremely frustrating when one sends many texts in a desperate attempt to get money and when that fails one visits a sick man and serves a notice that has already been served. One would perceive that to be a very poor attempt of intimidation, can I suggest that when you post information on a blog site you must at least be accurate with your information and please use spell check because your grammar is embarrassing in closing you do seem very desperate and if you urgently require money then get a job

[for your information I do have a job and regarding your comment 'desperate attempt to get monies' - get it right, desperate attempt for the truth and I will reveal it. Here is the original summons against me with the outcome of your team ordering the TRIAL and then Richard Macklin  withdrawing the complete claim 3 days before the trial date - not only a bluff and a big waste of time for all parties but at a cost to me of $28,000.00 to date]

Jim, discuss with your team and take responsibilty for your actions - I WANT ANSWERS

• Jim, are you an associate of the Magistrate whom was the magistrate for Action 7213 - (page 4)

• JIM - DID YOU KNOW THE TERMINATION OF MY POSITION INDIRECTLY EFFECTED THE LIQUIDATION OF KI-FERRIES-SA Pty Ltd and if I recall my position was terminated as per the said document dated 5 April, 2007 which contains your signature. 

 

•  Question: Are you an associate or friend of any shareholders/employees for the current company that is responsible for transporting people to and from Kangaroo Island via water. 

 

Dear Jim of DFK Gray Perry Accountants

Dear Jim of DFK Gray Perry Accountants 

I was recommended by the ATO to ask you this question as they have you on file as being a reputable Tax Agent  – how considerate, you and your partners must be proud to have developed such a good trusting relationship over the many years with the Australian Taxation Office.

 

PLEASE CLICK HERE FOR THE ADVISE I REQUIRE

---------------------------------------------------------------

Jim has taken a special interest in assisting his clients in their inter-generational changes, including retirement planning and business succession. Jim is also a Registered Company Auditor and in conjunction with Brendon Skates undertakes the firm’s audits.

• Jim Perry, what date did you take control of the Wisteria Lodge bank account - before  and after myself as manager

• Jim, can you please explain the reason for Sole proprietorship set up on 01 May 2004

• Jim, do you think I took the right step in setting up a company or do you think it was not necessary - PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION  

• Jim, here are the details of the company I set up

• The trustee for Wisteria Lodge Unit Trust

• WHY DID YOU NOT USE THE COMPANY AS YOU WHERE IN FEAR OF POSSIBLE BANKRUPTCY FOR RICK -  I have document proof of this on Page 2, Section 1