Mobile Phone Messages to and from 0403353461 and 0422655768 on the 23 March 2010

• Considering I sent this letter via email to only a few people at 9.10am on the 23-03-2010 (3 years with no success of a return call, text or email turned into success in 1 hour) the mobile number with no signature 0403353461 - Looking at the details contained within the messages received from 0403353461 indicates to me that these are words of a female unless of course this particular male likes to think ???? 
• (refer message 5 below, the words written and sent by the sender 0403353461)

 

• Take note Message 3: Signature not signiture all I ask is that if you are going to be a cyber bully state the most recent facts and stop guessing - 
• [my interpretation to this comment is this person is stating that this website contains facts, facts that are just not up to date. Thats good to know] 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. MESSAGE RECEIVED on my mobile phone being number 0422 655 768 at 10.16am on the 23-03-2010 from mobile phone +61403353461 with no signature :

• 10.16am

• It must be extremely frustrating when one sends many texts in a desperate attempt to get money and when that fails one visits a sick man and serves a notice that has already been served. One would perceive that to be a very poor attempt of intimidation, can I suggest that when you post information on a blog site you must at least be accurate with your information and please use spell check because your grammar is embarrassing in closing you do seem very desperate and if you urgently require money then get a job

[for your information I do have a job and regarding your comment 'desperate attempt to get monies' - get it right, desperate attempt for the truth and I will reveal it. Here is the original summons against me with the outcome of your team ordering the TRIAL and then Richard Macklin  withdrawing the complete claim 3 days before the trial date - not only a bluff and a big waste of time for all parties but at a cost to me of $28,000.00 to date]

Leon Clarence Macklin - Probate C56757

• Document C56757 - The last Will and Testament of Leon Clarence Macklin late of 6 Morriss Avenue Marion, South Australia.

• A copy of this document (C56757) can be seen by visiting www.leonclarencemacklin.com

• Pages 1 to 5 - Last Will and Testament

• Pages 6 to 9 - Schedule 1 - ('the Fund') -

• Please refer to this blog as I am going to explain in SIMPLE ENGLISH TERMS each and every clause, and who the beneficiaries are and how certain beneficaries will possibly become void if death occured and that includes 'presumed dead'.

• Please note that the EXECUTORS and TRUSTEES OF THE WILL are Richard John Macklin and Cari Marie Macklin of Unit 6/49 Arthur Street, Pennington, South Australia.
  

• Section 4.1 of clause 4 of Schedule 1 (page 6) - This clause indicates that a certain child or grandchild of Richard Macklin will possibly ( in the trustees discretion) become void of any benefits.

• Section 4.1.4 indicates that Richards spouse is entitled to receive all or part of the income of 'the Fund'( I have known Richard for 15 years and I have never known him to have a spouse apart from Mrs Palmer and the five daughters)  - I wonder if Richard knows he has a legally binding spouse and that at her discression if Rick was to 'die' or be 'presumed dead' is entitled to Leon Macklins Residuary Estate as detailed in Schedule 1 'the Fund' over Cari Macklin, the grandchild of Leon whom Leon directly appointed along with Rick as executors & trustees of his complete estate. 
• Clause 4, Section 4.1 insinuates whom will receive payments. (the keyword that places Cari at the risk of no entitlements is "equality"